Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence

Overview

The number of artificial intelligence tools that perform tasks such “paraphrasing” or rewording inputted text, solving problems/equations, writing code, answering questions, creating art, and“writing” content such as blogs or whole academic papers is increasing.

The rise of ChatGPT has amplified the conversation around these tools, but they have existed for quite some time in many forms.

AI tools may be used in a productive, creative, and educational manner, or they can be used to cheat, plagiarize, or attempt to disguise plagiarism. Instructors and �þ��Ƶs may be considering using these tools, so it is important to understand the implications of their use and when and how to use them appropriately.

The Howe Center for Writing Excellence and the Center for Teaching Excellence have published information and resources about AI tools as they pertain to teaching and assignment design. From an academic integrity perspective, instructors are encouraged to consider the following in order to promote integrity, prevent dishonesty, and to address potential unauthorized use of such tools, which could be considered a violation of the academic integrity policy:

Get to Know the Tools

Learn how ChatGPT and other tools (Jasper, Quillbot, DALL-E 2, Grammarly, Brainly,
Symbolab, PhotoMath, Socratic, etc.) work. Use them yourself.
Think about how the tools might be used creatively in your course.
- To demonstrate pros and cons of the tool(s)
- To view with an information literacy lens
- To analyze and critique what the generators produce in light of an assignment
  prompt or questions or to compare to work produced by �þ��Ƶs

Assignment Design

See the resources linked above, and other Teaching and Learning resources from the
Centers, with regard to assignment and assessment design.
Follow best practices in creating assignments that minimize the opportunity to use AI
tools or use them successfully (if you do not want �þ��Ƶs using them).
If allowing use of text-generating tools, require citations as you would for any source.

Communication and Expectations

Have discussions with your �þ��Ƶs about the use of AI text/answer/product
generating tools.
Set clear guidelines and expectations – explain why you have these guidelines.
Include your specific guidelines in course syllabi and assignment instructions.
Provide resources on appropriate source use, paraphrasing and summarizing, and
citation.
Have �þ��Ƶs practice paraphrasing and summarizing with an emphasis on
understanding and explaining content rather than just rewording/reordering content.
Discuss the purpose of course assignments.

Unauthorized Usage Detection

Use the tools yourself to understand how they work and what they generate. Generate output for your assignments to use as comparison to �þ��Ƶ work.
Review sources (some AI tools fabricate sources).
Select specific sources/content/choices to follow-up on with �þ��Ƶs in a conversation
Online “AI Detection” programs exist, but they are not well-tested and may not be accurate.

If you suspect Academic Dishonesty or have questions about whether an issue can or should be reported through the Academic Integrity process, contact Brenda Quaye, Assistant Director for Academic Integrity.